From: Rick McCallister
Message: 49941
Date: 2007-09-17
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, OctaviĆ Alexandre
> <oalexandre@...>
> wrote:
>
> > I think Renfrew's was right in stating the
> spreading of agriculture
> > through Europe was linked to the spreading of
> languages, but wrong
> > in that languages were IE. He overlooks too much
> linguistic data
> > for his theory to fit in what we know about IE.
> Nor he even
> > considered other non-IE languages as
> candidates........Hurrian and
> > Urartian (grouped toghether as Hurro-Urartian),
> once spoken in
> > Anatolian have been shown to be related to the NEC
> family.......
> > Other works link Etruscan (alongside with
> languages such as
> > Raethic, Lemnian, Eteo-Cretan, Eteo-Cypriot and
> pre-IE Greek) with
> > NEC and Hurro-Urartian. So the chances are all
> these languages
> > descent from the ones spoken by the first
> agricultors of the
> > Neolithic.
>
>
> The recent genetic paper on pig domestication in
> Europe available at
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2ynplm ,
>
> whose download link was already provided by M.
> Kelkar a few days
> ago, arrives at the conclusion that the earliest
> domesticated pigs
> in Europe were introduced from the Near East by
> neolithic farmers.
> The authors of that paper maintain that the
> discovery and analysis
> of ancient Near Eastern pig remains across Europe
> would suggest that
> Europe was colonized by Near Eastern farmers who
> brought their
> `farming package' of domesticated plants, animals
> and distinctive
> pottery styles with them. Thus, their conclusions
> appear consistent
> with Renfrew's hypothesis about a major 'demic'
> diffusion of farming
> populations from the Near East into Europe during
> the Neolithic,
> with the important difference that they, of course,
> don't assume
> that those farmers spoke IE languages!
>
> If these farmers really came to SE Europe from
> Anatolia, I agree
> with you that Hurro-Urartian/NEC languages are a
> good candidate for
> their linguistic affiliation. All the better if
> these languages will
> one day be proved to be related to
> Etruscan/Raethic/Lemnian, Eteo-
> Cretan, Eteo-Cypriot, pre-IE Greek ('Pelasgian'?),
> Hattic and you
> name it... :^)
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Francesco
>
>
>
>
>
>
>