Re: Re[2]: RE : [tied] Re: North of the Somme

From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 49817
Date: 2007-09-04

Ca-c-âre seems the right word to look at in Latin.
 
All these words look like "wild" developments
and morphological expansions or diminutives
around a *ka-kos = "bad" lexical base.
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Rick McCallister
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: RE : [tied] Re: North of the Somme

But are *skei- & *sker- related? --the forms are too
similar to pass up
and the s- is mobile, right? See cut, maybe Latin
caesare?

--- "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@... net> wrote:

> At 1:28:18 PM on Monday, September 3, 2007,
> fournet.arnaud
> wrote:
>
> >> From: Rick McCallister
>
> >> Isn't shit related to "shear", analogous to turd
> & tear?
>
> Watkins: 'shit' is from *skeid-, extended from
> *skei- 'to
> cut, to separate'; 'shear' is from *sker- 'to cut'.
> The
> PGmc. sources are *ski:tan and *skeran,
> respectively.
>
> > Could the root be *sk-H2i-t ?
>
> > or must it be *sk-i-t ?
>
> Not with the /t/ on the end.
>
> Brian
>
>
>

____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search. yahoo.com/ search?fr= oni_on_mail& p=summer+ activities+ for+kids& cs=bz