From: tgpedersen
Message: 49821
Date: 2007-09-04
>Aren't you forgetting Verner here?
> On 2007-09-03 20:38, squilluncus wrote:
>
> > However, Göt- (from Gaut-) and Got- (the th in the end is a later
> > decoration) are in no way lauthistorisch compatible.
>
> But they could well be related as containing different apophonic
> grades of the same root *g^Heud-: *g^Houd-o- > *Gauta- and
> *g^Hud-(on-) > *Gut-(an-), respectively.