PIE > sea (was: Re: sea, seal)

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:

>
> It is impossible that KArtvelian zaGHwa could be from *saHwo
> Because KArtvelian consonants are stable.
> *saHwo could have been borrowed into *saHvo, never zaGHwa.
> zaGHwa is the ground form.
>
> Look at this message
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/43771
>
> I think the idea that *sajwa is borrowed from pre-i.e speakers in
> Scandinavia is right.
> they had a word cognate with KArtvelian *saghwa
> and it was rendered in Germanic as *sajwa because I.E has no *z.
>
> A by-product of this idea is that Scandinavia couldn't be the
> original place for GErmanic people.
> They have to come from another place.

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/46131
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/47012
*sVkW-/*sVp- seems to have been a 'coast word'
If anything, the direction of loan is Kartv. > Germanic, which would
make sense if one believed in the connection of Vanir with the Kingdom
of Vani.
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/11133
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/29508


Torsten