Re Re: Fw: [tied] Pferd

Basically, when I wrote this

I was meaning several points :

1. Paris can be derived from good P-celt Gaulish *kwr-s- "oak"

2. I reject the proposed *par-is- "People on the Oise" as totally impossible.

This meaning should be phoned "ar-isari (kos)"

3. I consider most tribes in the north of Paris to be good "P-celt" GAuls

especially in the Somme, Oise, and Artois departments.

I am extremely skeptical as far as this dichotomy between Gauls and Belgians is concerned

Because I consider in the first place that this word "GAul" is ethnolinguistically unclear

And this "Belgian" hypothesis sounds even more shaky.

Especially when "Belgians" are put in these places where you are about sure these are good P-celt Gauls.

----- Original Message -----

From: stlatos

To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 12:02 AM

Subject: [Courrier indésirable] Re: Fw: [tied] Pferd

--- In cybalist@... s.com, "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@ ...>
wrote:

> As for Paris, and Oise River,

> Some tribe names are based on tree names,
> so my own explanation :
> Parisi < *kwr-s-i : those of the oak (Root *kwrs-u oak)
> Carnuti < those of the hornbeam tree
> Eburi < those of the yew

Parisi might be from a derivative of 'oak', but what suggests this
specifically?