--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
wrote:
> You still need to think :
>
> 1. because for dental+dental the output of Alb. is s from an
older
> affricative probable c^
> And the timeframe of dental+dental transformation is a pre-
> historic one
>
> 2. This Dental+Dental transformation has nothing to do: with the
> two stop reduction in PAlb.: this second transformation (even
is "a
> Pre-Latin one") happened somewhere around -200BC :-: 100 AC : so
it's
> a historical (later) one.
>
> Marius
*************
And you could prove it from examples, probably, not from
besa 'faith, trust', as Piotr have tried once (see previous message).
*bhidh-ti-a: > Alb besë and Alb bletë 'bee, honeybee, apis' and
Greek melitta/melissa 'id.' are sufficient counterexamples. If you
wish I could offer other examples. So, as I claim many times, it's
good to stop speculations and to start from concrete examples.
Lack of knowledge of other languages and their specifics can't be
compensated by dry theorizations and speculations.
Konushevci