Re: [tied] *ud- 'out'

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci"
<akonushevci@...> wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Sean Whalen <stlatos@> wrote:

> > so:
> >
> > u_dtèró+s u_dtr(e)+ > u_ttèró+s u_dr(e)+ >
> >
> > u_ttèró+s u_ttr(e)+ & u_dèró+s u_dr(e)+
> >
> > each new paradigm with a particular meaning.

> ************
> I have nothing to think or to believe except the very simple rule:
> in a cluster of two stops, the first one is lost: *nokW-t- >
> natë 'night', *septm. > shtatë 'seven', *sek-ti > shat 'hoe'.
>
> Konushevci
>

You still need to think :

1. because for dental+dental the output of Alb. is s from an older
affricative probable c^
And the timeframe of dental+dental transformation is a pre-
historic one

2. This Dental+Dental transformation has nothing to do: with the
two stop reduction in PAlb.: this second transformation (even is "a
Pre-Latin one") happened somewhere around -200BC :-: 100 AC : so it's
a historical (later) one.

Marius