Re: [tied] Latin m>w, w>m

From: Sean Whalen
Message: 48023
Date: 2007-03-21

--- Sean Whalen <stlatos@...> wrote:

> Rules:
>
> e>o / w_gW
> gW>w / V_V
> gW>w / V_N
> m>w / #_l
> o>u / w_w
> wu>u: / _w
> w>m / o_b
> w>m / u:_V [-front?, optional?]
> w>0 / #_R

I suppose that:

gW>w / V_N

also only occurs after o/u:

negWno+ ... xukWn.o+ ... xagWno+
nogWno+ ... xukWn.o+ ... xagWno+
nogWno+ ... ukWn.o+ .... agWno+
nogWno+ ... ugWn.o+ .... agWno+
nowno+ .... uwn.o+ ..... agWno+
nowno+ .... awn.o+ ..... agWno+
nouno+ .... aun.o+ ..... agWno+
noudo+ .... aun.o+ ..... agWno+

nu:dus .... aulla ...... agnus

naked ..... pot ........ lamb





____________________________________________________________________________________
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html