Re: [tied] Syllabic (was: Etymology of Rome - h1rh1-em-/h1rh1-o:m-)

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:

>
> On 2007-03-16 13:02, Sean Whalen wrote:

> > I'd be very hesitant to reconstruct a word with two
> > x's in a row based on apparent reflexes in one branch.
>
> Not in a row. They are separated by a vowel and belong to differnt
> members of a compound in my analysis.

What compound? Would this be the source of Lith. gerve: also?