From: Sean Whalen
Message: 47967
Date: 2007-03-19
> On 2007-03-18 16:05, Sean Whalen wrote:I have nothing against analogy in principle, I just
>
> > Not if xWt > tH there as I'm arguing.
>
> But it's <pratara->, not *<pratHara-> (or
> *<pro:tara->).
> > I think different aspiration rules operated inI'm not saying the Greek forms are regular;
> different languages.
> > You've said these don't work after X+syl, but:
> >
> > PIE *gWer-xW-tro+ 'throat' > Lith gerkle: Grk
> *bérathrom > bérethron
> > / bárathron 'pit'
>
> Also Lith. gurkly~s. Cf. Slavic *gUrdlo-/*z^Irdlo-
> 'throat' and the
> full-grade *z^erdlo- 'river-mouth, abyss'. Slavic
> and Baltic (like
> Indo-Iranian) show no alternation whatsoever either
> in the initial
> consonant of the suffix or in the liquid (Slavic has
> *-dlo-, which may
> be the regular phonetic development of *-tlo-, cf.
> *setm- > *sedm-,
> while Baltic has -kla- < *-tlo-). I wonder if we
> aren't dealing with a
> different root in Greek (or perhaps a merger of two
> word-families in
> Slavic), as it's unusual for *erh3 or *r.h3 to
> produce Gk. -ara- or -ere-.
> 'auger' or Gk. péletHron < *kWélh1-trom. The 'pit'____________________________________________________________________________________
> word might be
> connected with *gWerh2- (as in *gWr.h2-ú- 'heavy')
> rather than *gWerh3-
> 'devour'.