From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 47434
Date: 2007-02-13
>>[mcv]The ending *-d is strictly neuter NA sg. It is highly
>> I can't do anything with pecus, pecudis
>
>How about a 'pronominal ending' *pek^ud-. If Slavic can do it, so can
>Latin.
>Which reminds meAs u-stems (= Fourth Declension).
>
>http://www.hhhh.org/perseant/libellus/aides/allgre/allgre.105.html
>
>These variants I haven't seen before. We might have nom. *pek^ud ->
>pecĂș, abl. *pek^ud -> pecĂș. It meshes nicely with my idea that the
>pronominal nNA -d is an old partitive = ablative. How would you
>explain them?