From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 47433
Date: 2007-02-13
>If the suffix had the shape *-CVn, there is usually no way
>> /o/ was a long vowel at the time ([o:]), and wouldn't have
>> been reduced.
>>
>> >> NA *g^á:n-un > *g^ónur
>> >> G *g^a:n-ún-a:s > *g^en&wós > *g^énwos
>> >> or, with early stress-shift:
>> >> G > *g^enw&nós > *g^énunos
>> >> L *g^a:n-ún-a > *g^enéw-i > *g^énui
>> >> I *g^a:n-un-éh1 > *g^enunéh1 > *g^énuneh1
>> >> du.
>> >> NA *g^á:n-un-ih1 > *g^ónunih1 (cf. Skt. januni:, Toch.B
>> >> keni:ne)
>> >
>> >Is this *-ur/*-un heteroclitic matched with similar *-ir/*-in and
>> >*-ar/*-an heteroclitics?
>>
>> Sure. The *-[C]ar/*-[C]an heteroclitics are the normal
>> -r/-n heteroclitics [after zero grade]. The *-[C]ir/*-[C]in
>> heteroclitics are the i/n-stems of Sanskrit (áks.i, aks.nás
>> "eye", ásthi, asthnás "bone", dádhi, dadhnás "curds",
>> sákthi, sakthná: "thigh"). *potis (Toch. petso reflects the
>> old nominative *pótyo:n) is probably a non-neuter member of
>> this same group.
>>
>> >If so, is the *-r/*-n part detachable from the stem in *-u, *-i and
>*-a?
>>
>> No. *-un- is a suffix. Suffixes are (C)VC(C).
>
>
>How do you distinguish your *-un, *-in, *-an stems from traditional
>n-stems?