Re: [tied] Thematic root aorist

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 45369
Date: 2006-07-15

On 2006-07-14 23:18, Edgard Bikelis wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there any PIE root that is by itself a thematic root
> aorist/punctual, in the same way as *bher- is durative?
>
> The best example I did find for now is from Vedic ávidam / ávidas /
> ávidat, but this verb seems to be from our old friend *weyd-. If so,
> from where came the -n- from the present vindá:mi / vindási / vindáti?
> Is that the nasal infix from the seventh class, that went to the weak
> grade as it lost the accent for the thematic vowel, or am I just messing
> up everything ; )?

The history of the problem is one of gradual elimination. There are
_very_ few if any simple thematic aorists that are reconstructible for
PIE. All such aorists seem to have originated as athematic aorist
subjunctives converted into indicatives or old middles converted into
actives. The best examples of relatively old simple thematic aorist are
*h1ludH-é/ó- and *wid-é/ó-, the latter less secure than it used to be,
since athematic *weid-/*wid- (secondarily thematised) is suggested by
Lat. vi:dit vs. Gk eîde, Skt. ávidat. Lat. vi:dit was once regarded as a
reflex of perf. *wóide, but that's unlikely given its meaning ('saw,
perceived' etc., never 'knows').

Piotr