--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci"
<akonushevci@...> wrote:
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci"
> > <akonushevci@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3"
> <alexandru_mg3@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci"
> > > > <akonushevci@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3"
> > > <alexandru_mg3@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > So finally: could you derived here hundë rule-by-rule from PIE
> *neu-
> > ks? To can talk about issues....or not ?
> > > > > > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci"
> > > > > > <akonushevci@> wrote:
> [AK]
> So, if we assume doublet by inversion, *ksun-ta:, then we have *ks
>
> Alb. /h/ (cf. Greek kse:nos and ALb. <i huej/huaj>) and -nt-
cluster
> that prevent the rhotacism.
By inversion? *neu-ks > *ksunta:? Could you be more detailed on
this 'inversion'? How many sounds we need 'to invert' here? Please
help :)
> I was not so wise to see that I have to deal with genius:), but
> little invalid in mind and in language.
>
Yes, it's also strange for me too that 'you have eyes but you cannot
see' : please try to look Only on the derivation:
PIE nil-grade *nh2s-ú-nt-o/eh2 > PAlb/Dacian? *asúnta: > Alb. hundë
It's 'quite a good one' :) despite 'your frustrations' :)
I mean is 'obviously much much better' :) then :
1. hundë from hu
2. hundë from the 'inverted' *neu-ks
etc...
So finally, if its looks better than different 'other trials' made
by Meyer, Baric^, Huld, Orel, Tagliavini, C^abej etc... :), you will
reject it Only because you don't have 'my name' in your 'dedicated
list' :).
Please forget 'your list' and look to the derivation....:)
PIE nil-grade *nh2s-ú-nt-o/eh2 > PAlb/Dacian? *asúnta: > Alb. hundë
A derivation is good or wrong in its-self; you 'don't need to know
who proposed it' ...This thing seems 'to make you blind': and
finally it determines you to arrive to accept
different 'inversions' ...
Cheers,
Marius :)
P>S> Anyway, thanks, for the appreciation: "> little invalid in
mind and in language" :) I suppose that is nothing personal,
here , :) just a simple appreciation :)
I ask myself: what could disturb you, so much, that you cannot
refrain you, sometimes? Because finally I only wrote:
PIE nil-grade *nh2s-ú-nt-o/eh2 > PAlb/Dacian? *asúnta: > Alb. hundë