From: tgpedersen
Message: 43051
Date: 2006-01-20
> >they
> > ***
> > Patrick:
> >
> > The explanation is far simpler.
> >
> > Far North Europeans did not originally speak IE; and when
> did learn to speak it, they learned imperfectly, and retainedsome
> speech habits from whatever they spoke before.this
> >
>
> Yes, that is what 'substrate' means. I which way do you believe
> differs from what I said (apart from the fact that I think thatthe
> immediate substrate in Northern Europe was IE)?can write this.
>
> ***
> Patrick:
>
> Your idea of 'substrate' and mine are certainly different if you
>That much is obvious.
> I did not say that Nordic physical types were the substrate, andautochthonous. That is what you are saying, is that not right?
>No. I am talking about languages.
> Rather, I think it likelier that Nordic physical types speakinga non-IE language invaded Northern territory already inhabited by