From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 42537
Date: 2005-12-16
> VI.I don't think it's nonsense. Alb. sjell corresponds formally to Skt.
> ----------------
> ln > ll (we need to find a good example)
>
> NOTE: sjell is not from PAlb c^el-na because the output would have
> been *sjall not sjell...So Alb. sjell < PAlb *c^e-la (for the same
> reason vjell < *we-la)
>
>
> Please, Piotr or others, defend me from such nonsenses.