Re: [tied] Lost of intervocalic -d- in Albanian bi-syllabic words?

alexandru_mg3 wrote:

> This 'hocus-pocus' Piotr of 'dz and ddz' :) (in place of 'dz>dh
> finished earlier then g^>dz' etc..) is once again based on 'your fix
> idea' that there is "no phonetic influence of Romanian Substratum on
> the Balkan Latin and next on Proto-Romanian" => Based on this 'fix
> idea' => 'you have tried first to put all these transformations
> between sec II - sec V CE' ...

I certainly have no such "fix idea", and while I object to your
straw-man misinterpretation of my views, I don't feel like continuing
this debate. I've stated my position with, I hope, enough clarity, and I
can rest my case. This topic has dominated the forum for too long, and
that's also one of the things we shouldn't do.

Piotr