Re: [tied] Lost of intervocalic -d- in Albanian bi-syllabic words?

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...>
wrote:

>
> alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > This 'hocus-pocus' Piotr of 'dz and ddz' :) (in place of 'dz>dh
> > finished earlier then g^>dz' etc..) is once again based on 'your

fix

> > idea' that there is "no phonetic influence of Romanian Substratum

on

> > the Balkan Latin and next on Proto-Romanian" => Based on

this 'fix

> > idea' => 'you have tried first to put all these transformations
> > between sec II - sec V CE' ...
>
> I certainly have no such "fix idea", and while I object to your
> straw-man misinterpretation of my views, I don't feel like

continuing

> this debate. I've stated my position with, I hope, enough clarity,

and I

> can rest my case. This topic has dominated the forum for too long,

and

> that's also one of the things we shouldn't do.
>
> Piotr

Sorry Piotr, maybe I have exagerated my last reaction, so I apologize
if so...But talking about 'fix ideas' is you not me that used first
this term in our discussion....when the a lot of arguments were still
on the table on my side....

So now when you have started to introduce: dh-1, dh-2, dz, ddz, a:-
1 , a:-2 to can still 'keep alive' your model...this were too much
for me....

I closed this topic too, here...

Best Regards,
Marius