From: tgpedersen
Message: 42221
Date: 2005-11-24
> The nom.pl. <cildru> (beside <cild>) and gen.pl. <cildra> indicatean
> iz-neuter, which of course doesn't necessarily mean that theformation
> goes all the way back to PGmc. It may have arisen on the analogy ofon
> *kilbiz-. The modern plural represents a Middle English reflex of
> <cildru> plus the weak-noun plural ending, which was often slapped
> minor-declension plurals for good measure.It has pl. -er in both German and Dutch: Kinder, kinderen
>