From: mkelkar2003
Message: 41599
Date: 2005-10-25
>You are most welcome Mr. Milton! The above observation was made in
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "mkelkar2003" <smykelkar@...> wrote:
>
> >http://www.cs.rice.edu/~nakhleh/Papers/81.2nakhleh.pdf
>
> > Looking at their original tree Fig 7 I counted 5 CONTINUOUS nodes to
> > IIr from the root. MORE THAN ANY OTHER BRANCH. What that means is the
> > "PIE homeland" was in the Indian Subcontinent. They could to have
> > moved the shortest distance to preserver such continuity.
>
> > M. Kelkar
> ***********
> First, I'd like to thank Mr. Kelkar for bringing the Nakhleh et
> al. papers to our attention. The combination of advanced graphing
> theory and solid linguistic input (as it appears to me as a nonexpert
> in both fields)is most impressive, and I've got them bookmarked for
> much closer study.
> But the deduction in the paragraph quoted above seems staggeringly
> illogical. If I'm missing something, please explain.
> If the most nodes from the root reaches the branch closest to the
> homeland (and might an Iranian find a slightly different location?),
> then the next closest is Balto-Slavic, then Germanic, then
> Greek-Armenian, Albanian, Italo-Celtic, and the farthest
> Tocharian-Armenian.
> Interesting geography!
> Dan