Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: 3rd Slavic palatalization

From: Grzegorz Jagodzinski
Message: 41185
Date: 2005-10-09

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...>
To: "Grzegorz Jagodzinski" <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 10:11 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [tied] Re: 3rd Slavic palatalization


> And I gave you just such a view: Carlton is (or was) in the
> Department of Slavic and East European Studies at the
> University of Alberta, and his book is a high-level academic
> textbook and general reference on comparative Slavic
> phonology.
>
> [...]
>
>> Of course, such a view is based on more "serious" sources,
>> see my quotations in one of the previous posts. Perhaps
>> these sources are not available in English.
>
> Your chauvinism and condescension are misplaced: the book
> that I cited is a serious source.
>
> Brian

Chauvinism? Do not exaggerate. But I have written "these" souces and not
"those" sources, thinking of "serious" sources printed in Poland in Polish
and not translated into English, whose authors reject the idea of early
progressive palatalization. "Serious" means academic books, articles etc.

I do not deny that Carlton is a serious scholar but his views are
incompatible with what is published in Polish (and, I believe, on other
Slavic languages). And it seems that some of his views are based on
disputable works.

Of course I could say that basing oneself only on English resources is
chauvinistic as well... or rather very unilateral.
Grzegorz J.



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com