Re: [tied] Re: Short and long vowels

From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 39270
Date: 2005-07-17

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Short and long vowels

On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:31:20 -0500, Patrick Ryan
<proto-language@...> wrote:

>  I agree completely except I think we started out with *e, *a, and *o  +*H (undifferentiated). But the result of the combination of a vowel and a 'laryngeal' resulted in long (double length) vowels.
>
>  You then say: "These then developed in the normal way in the daughter languages."
>
>  Again I agree completely.
>
>  Zero-grade involved the removal of one vowel: *men- + *tó = *mNtó
>
>  Zero-grade with the removal of one vowel from *dhe:- /dHee/, *sta:- /staa/, and *do:- /doo/ leaves *dhe-, *sta-, and *do-.

There: you're saying it again.
 
***
Patrick:
 
Yes, and I will continue to say it.