From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 39088
Date: 2005-07-07
----- Original Message -----From: alexandru_mg3Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 6:12 AMSubject: [tied] Re: Early PAlb Depalatisations of k', g' > k, g> But terminology is another matter. If we cannot agree on the
> proper terms to convey our thoughts, then we cannot communicate.
Ok. Patrick. I agree with you here. I will try to be aligned on this.
However, I don't think that my used terms were fully
incomprehensible as you have suggested here...so your feedback
contains also an exageration on your side. But in principle I fully
agree with you.
On the other hand, (don't take this personally): on this topic
however you didn't post any concrete argument.
From here I didn't understand your position regarding Sl. slava.
You have talked about the output of e: in different languages without
to address the *eu or even *eu(H) that is another thing here.
Also no remark from you if the depalatization happened or not in this
case.
So your remark wasn't really 'linked' to the topic. From here my
feedback regarding this: I have asked you to post concrete arguments
regarding this topic.
Knowing that you manage very well the terminology I'm sure that there
will be no issue for you to make a good analyze regarding Sl. slava
here...
Thanks and Best Regards,
Marius
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cybalist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/