Re: [tied] *k^red- [was: Re: Clarification for short story.]

From: P&G
Message: 38758
Date: 2005-06-19

>> > The Latin form seems to be k^re: - dHeh1.
>
> Does it? Why not *-ed[z]dH- > *-ezd- > -e:d-, esp. in view of OIr.
> cretim 'believe' < *kredd-?

I see that Sihler offers this explanation as well.

Peter

Previous in thread: 38728
Next in thread: 38782
Previous message: 38757
Next message: 38759

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts