From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 38599
Date: 2005-06-13
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci"************
> <akonushevci@...> wrote:
>
> > > > Alb. [] /*s/ > /j/.
> > > > I remember that it was first mentiond this etymology by Mr.
> > Rasmusen.
>
> [Piotr:]
> > > Was it? I would still find it unacceptable. Neither *j > Alb. z
> > nor *-s-
> > > > Alb. -j- are independently established and generally recognised
> > sound
> > > changes, so you can't assume they are "regular" if that's
> > precisely what
> > > you set out to prove.
>
> I have NOT proposed a regular sound law "s > j" for Albanian. I have
> however, proposed an event of lenition of the expected product of *s-,
> viz. gj-, to Alb. j-. A good example is jo-në 'our' (fem.) from *sa: +
> enclit. *nos. Since IE *y- also gives Alb. gj-, I would assume that
> ju 'you' (pl.) is also a reduced form. And the verb to be certainly
> also qualifies, so janë 'they are' could be a reduced form of
> (expected) *gjanë from *senti or *sonti.
> Jens