Re: [tied] IE *de:(y)- 'bind'.

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Ryan" <proto-
language@...> wrote:

>> > As for *yaH-, I would regard the stative as meaning 'gone

away' not

> 'be in progress'; that would be, by my lights, durative, hence

present

> or imperfect. The perfect would convey 'gone to and arrived at'.
> Did you not write about *-t as an agentive formant in another

thread?

I did; was that a crime?

JER:

> If the remarkable Indic forms with iraj- are related it must be

a

> laryngeal.
>
> ***
> Patrick writes:
>
> *H3o- as a prefix also contains a 'laryngeal'.

You can't derive Indic ir- from *H3or-.

Jens