From: pielewe
Message: 36410
Date: 2005-02-19
> ...There is noThere *is* in the MAS view. Mind you, it is *their* tonality and
> relationship between mobile stress and the tonality of the
> desinence.
> ... In any case, as I said, Hirt'sThis is the very example the Kortlandt people invariably adduce to
> law has nothing to do with acuteness per se: *te\n(&)/wós
> (acute first syllable) > Latv. tiêvs, without Hirt's law).
> There are good reasons not to reverse the description, theAs I said earlier, I would very much like to hear the cognoscenti
> main one being, as I said, zero grade.
> ... In the case of -V:R (-V::) and -VHR endings,Those tones have nothing to do with the tonal phenomena the
> Greek has an acute, while BS has a circumflex. This is due
> to the fact that in Greek such sequences (unless involving
> *y and *w) were no longer treated as (rising-falling)
> diphthongs, so that the tone of the first part (rising) is
> all that's left.
> If something like Dybo's law also occurred in Old Prussian,This presupposes that a falling tone is better at ceding the stress
> as Kortlandt argues (I haven't seen the evidence, and my
> knowledge of Old Prussian is so minimal that I'm not sure I
> would be able to evaluate it), then it looks as if short
> stressed vowels, at least in initial syllables, shared a
> characteristic at the Balto-Slavic level, namely that they
> had falling, or at any rate non-rising, tone.