From: Sean Whalen
Message: 36053
Date: 2005-01-27
> The problem with both *m�xte:r and *bhr�xte:r isI respect your theories, since they are similar to
> that they violate
> one or both of two apparent earlier phonological
> processes in IE:
> 1. Syllables with an unstressed later-Ablauting
> vowel (which I
> reconstruct as */a/ based on its centrality) reduce
> it to zero when
> phonotactics allow (= zero-grade).
> 2. Later, syllables with an atonic Ablauting vowel
> (that is, /a/)
> become /o/ and those with a tonic vowel (/�/) become
> /�/.