From: petegray
Message: 36020
Date: 2005-01-21
> >> the retention the velar in _all_ Indo-Iranian forms (except inOh, silly me. I just assumed the g- was generalised, and hadn't seen the
> >>reduplication syllables, as in 3sg. perf. jagau < *g(W)e-g(W)oH-e).
> > Why should the velar not survive?
> Well, it should have been palatalised before *e.
> My own proposal, published some time ago, was that the "long-diphthongI like that. There are a large number of roots which Pokorny lists with a
> roots" had the structure CeiH-, with monophthongisation