From: elmeras2000
Message: 35491
Date: 2004-12-19
> I found an interesting (if somewhat awkwardly20030324/001530.html
> translated) interview with the Albanian scholar K.
> Resuli-Burovich. Cf.
> http://www.alb-net.com/pipermail/art-cafe/Week-of-Mon-
>I may not be much of an Albanologist, but I can see that the text is
> Any comments from our Albanologists?
> I discovered that notWould it make the Albanians autochthonous if Albanian is the
> only
> the Albanians are not autochthonous people, but they are also not
> related in any way to the Pelasgians or the Illyrians.
> I discovered that by chance, studying the Albaniandiscovered
> language, which, all agree, is of the type SATEM. According to that
> global
> division of languages, researching the Illyrian language I
> that it is of the type KENTUM. The most elementary logic wassaying to
> me that one SATEM language can not be a direct descendant, noteven a
> kind of derivative of some KENTUM language, without a change ofchanges in
> its substrate. Since the Albanian language does not have any
> its substrate, that means that the Albanians canĀ¹t be, under anyHow can it even be considered a possibility that a language changes
> circumstance, genealogical descendants of the Illyrians.