Re: Latin va:gi:na - PIE ?

<<That language might have been an IE
one, if the 'proper' IE root *weg- "transport" is a cognate.>>

I don't have any proof but I think also that the original PIE root
was *weg- or *weh2g- or something similar so it wasn't *wag or
*wah2g.
So I suspect also that we don't have an original 'a' in this PIE
root, but once again I don't have any proof here...

Only the Best,
marius