Re: [tied] Metathesis of liquids

From: alex
Message: 33661
Date: 2004-07-31

Abdullah Konushevci wrote:
> II. Metathesis L - V > V - L
>
> 2.1. Liquids' metathesis l - a > a(�) - l
> Aor. <plasa>, but present <p�lcas> `to break out' ( < palsas, notice
> ls > lc like rs > rc in aor. <krisa>, but present <k�rcas>); <p�lqej>
> (< palqej) `to like, desire' from Lat. <placere>.

this "p�lcas" remember me of Rom. "pleca" ( to break out, to leave ). From
the semantic aspect , I guess Latin "plicare" is not cognate here. The
question remains why Alb "c" (ts) for Rom. "c" (k) but this question is not
related to the metathesis of the liquids.
The another word (p�lqej) which appears to be from Latin shows the well
known change: Latin "ce-", Rom. "c^e-", Alb. "qe", thus here the phonetic
changes work regulary.

Alex

Next in thread: 33662
Previous message: 33660
Next message: 33662

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts