Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel

enlil@... wrote:

> Miguel:
> > The PIE dative is never reconstructed as *-i by anyone who knows
> what> they're talking about.
>
> Excellent >:) Datives are of course marked often with *-ei but
> what do you think the dative of *wlkWo- is, for the record?

*wl.kWo-ei = *wl.kWo:i.

*-i is the locative (*wl.kWoi).