From: Sergejus Tarasovas
Message: 33258
Date: 2004-06-18
> -----Original Message-----Also OCS xleNbI 'waterfall' and Lith. (Z^em.) sklem~bti 'slide aside, slide
> From: Sergejus Tarasovas [mailto:S.Tarasovas@...]
> Taking into account Lith. <skujà> 'id.', isn't it tempting at
> least in this case to derive PSl. *x- from *sk-?