From: Sergejus Tarasovas
Message: 33257
Date: 2004-06-18
> -----Original Message-----Taking into account Lith. <skujà> 'id.', isn't it tempting at least in this
> From: Petr Hrubis [mailto:petusek@...]
> 2. Cz xvoji:, Pol
> xoja, R xvoja, Sln ho^ja, S/C xvoja (???: < PS *xvojI, *xvoja
> < ???)