From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 33214
Date: 2004-06-11
>Yes, that's very detailed,I can get much more detailed than that, but not without
>but a detailed conjecture is still aWell, go ahead, who's stopping you?
>conjecture. And it's based on the assumption that laryngeals had
>disappeared in Greek, which ihis case amounts to begging the
>question. I don't think anyone tried to work out the details of the
>hypothetical case that they hadn't.