Re: [tied] Re: Old Czech hpán vs. Modern Czech pan, pán

On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 16:20:18 +0000, tgpedersen
<tgpedersen@...> wrote:

>Burrows: The Sanskrit Language p. 169
>"
>p-ati 'master'
>
>Footnote
>From pa:- 'to protect, govern'. That the /t/ in this word is suffixal
>is evident from its absence inGk. <despoina>. Therefore <páti-> is to
>pá- (<nr.pa-, etc) as <vr.káti-> to <vr.ka->.
>"

Burrows is wrong. There is no way *pot- can be derived from
*poh3-.

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...