Re: [tied] *g'(h)- > d as aberrant outcome

From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 32503
Date: 2004-05-08

On Sat, 08 May 2004 18:55:04 +0200, alex
<alxmoeller@...> wrote:

>Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "alex" <alxmoeller@...>
>> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 1:52 PM
>> Subject: Re: [tied] *g'(h)- > d as aberrant outcome
>>
>>
>>> do I understand you right here when I think you mean "ngjesh" <
>>> "*h^en-)joh3s-"?
>>> If yes, trough which kind of changes we will get "ghe" in Rom. in
>>> this case? I ask it since I consider Albanian "ngjesh" is the same
>>> word as Rom. "înghesui"
>>
>> If that's right, the word was borrowed when the Albanian reflex of
>> *j- was something like *G'-.
>
>hmmm... why Alb. "G'"?
>so far I know, Alb. "gjendër" is seen as a derivative from Latin
>"glandula"(the same is said about Rom. "ghindurã"; if that is true we
>have already the change "gl" > "g" in Alb. as well and then we do not
>have to search for any Alb. "G'"

gl > gj = G' (voiced palatal stop).


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...