Re: [tied] Re: Late Proto Albanian *3 /dz/ = Early Proto Romanian

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

> On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 19:49:54 +0100, altamix <alxmoeller@...>
> wrote:
>
>> Miguel Carrasquer wrote:
>>>
>>> No. I showed that you were trying to compare Romanian a:-stems with
>>> Lithuanian thematics.
>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/23608
>>
>> Look Miguel, you sustain that the II Latin conjugation was
>> generlised over all in "s" droping Romance, aka Italian and Romanian.
>
> Of course I don't.

Indeed, you wrote just that the 2sg. ending -i was generalized to all
conjugations in the
s-dropping Romances (Italian and Romanian).

<-conjugations>

> -eo: > -0/-u

what do you think about merging together of Latin conj. II and IV in PBR
?

Alex