Re: [tied] Re: Dog

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 30045
Date: 2004-01-26

26-01-04 14:31, tgpedersen wrote:

> Latin canis obviously doesn't fit with *kWn.- either (loan from the
> Old European 'a-language'), so how would the assumption of a proto-
> Albanian *kan(d)- be in violation of Occam? That would not add any
> extra root to the ones we already have to assume.

Even simpler is the derivation of <qen> from <canis> :-)

Piotr