From: tgpedersen
Message: 30024
Date: 2004-01-26
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>think
> wrote:
>
> > As another speaker of that language having channels on cable TV
> > speaking languages that didn't, I sometimes wonder if not PIE
> > paradigms might have alternating palatalised and non-palatalised
> > allophones, eg. k^/k, from which the daughter languages
> generalised.
>
> Indeed, you were discussing this issue in the thread including
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/8360 . I don't
> you had a good explanation of the development *ek^wos 'horse',Personally, I liked
> however you might like it for Lithuanian plakti 'to strike,
> chastise' (is that really 'to flog'?).
>