Re: [tied] Baltic-Slavic disintegration

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" wrote:

> Alexander, there is no proof for Thracian as being a Satem language
> beside some wild guesses. There is absolutely nothing where we know
> about the meaning of a certain Thracian word for sure

What about "Rizas" for instance?!

> and we can connect it with a IE root for showing: look , Thracian
> was a Satem language. All the people who sustained Thracian should
> have been a satem language could not deliver the needed proof
> which shows that. Just assumptions.

Thus spoke the world-known linguist A.M. who already read thrice
everything written in speciality domain and understood perfectly
the errors of his predecessors he is not willing to commit.

Amen,
Marius Iacomi