Re: [tied] Baltic-Slavic disintegration

m_iacomi wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alex" wrote:
>
>> Alexander, there is no proof for Thracian as being a Satem language
>> beside some wild guesses. There is absolutely nothing where we know
>> about the meaning of a certain Thracian word for sure
>
> What about "Rizas" for instance?!

is this a glosse`?

>
>> and we can connect it with a IE root for showing: look , Thracian
>> was a Satem language. All the people who sustained Thracian should
>> have been a satem language could not deliver the needed proof
>> which shows that. Just assumptions.
>
> Thus spoke the world-known linguist A.M. who already read thrice
> everything written in speciality domain and understood perfectly
> the errors of his predecessors he is not willing to commit.
>
> Amen,
> Marius Iacomi

Your sarcasmus is odd & of 2 penny value. Let your frustration somewhere
else. I said, there is no proove shown, just assumtions. If you have the
proove (no assumtion) show it.

Alex