Hello All,
Finally something doesn't fit these 2 romanian derivations supposed
to be from Latin :
for
a) <apoi> (then) - the proposed latin source is 'ad post'
b) <dup~a> (behind) - the proposed latin source is 'de post'
Now could this 'post' become either 'poi' and 'p~a' ?
For me is hard to believe.
Any help here?
Thanks and Best Regards,
Marius A.