From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 27829
Date: 2003-11-29
>--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Carrasquer <mcv@...> wrote:To which one might argue that in that case one might expect to see abundant
>>
>> Latin, for instance, distinguishes -m. (-em, as in the accusative)
>> from -n. (-en, as in the -mn.-neuters, no:men, etc.).
>
>To which one might argue that whoever designed Latin orthography
>didn't want a stem to alternate as much as *-em, *-in-, and therefore
>made an allowance for "etymological spelling" in such cases.