Miguel Carrasquer wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 03:42:10 +0000, alexandru_mg3
> <alexandru_mg3@...> wrote:
>
>> Conclusion : If we not take into account the Dalmatian coast
>> (Ilyrians), the Latin zone in the Balkans was ALMOST LOCATED ONLY in
>> the Daco-Getae zones.This leads us to the conclusion that the whole
>> substrate of Balkans Latin is a Dacian one.
>
> The Roman province of Illyricum comprised a whole lot more than just
> the Dalmatian coast.
>
> The key, I think, is what were the aboriginal languages in the
> province of Moesia.
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...
>
mmm.... Moesia Inferior is supposed to have been populated by Getae.
Moesia Superior too. Outside of Moesia begunn in fact the Thracia in
South, Dardania in South-West,in west we have the Panonen. In Moesia
Superior ( let us remain South ofDanube) we have some tribes as
Triballi, Tilatai, Crobyzi, Tricornesi, etc.
It was said by ancient writters that beside the Illrians, all these
peoples inclusive the dacians on the both shore of Danube spoke the same
language.
Funny writters. None was interesed to let us some sentences in that
language they tell us about.
I assume that even if one will try to see in "tricornesi" a compound of
tri + corn then the interpretation must be false or the name should be
Latin. Since the name is known before Latin entered the Balkans, I
assume there is seen everything else as a compound as "tri" + "corn" in
this name.
Alex