Re: [tied] Older Dacian zone in Balkans = Later Latin zone in Balka

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 03:42:10 +0000, alexandru_mg3 <alexandru_mg3@...>
wrote:

> Conclusion : If we not take into account the Dalmatian coast
>(Ilyrians), the Latin zone in the Balkans was ALMOST LOCATED ONLY in
>the Daco-Getae zones.This leads us to the conclusion that the whole
>substrate of Balkans Latin is a Dacian one.

The Roman province of Illyricum comprised a whole lot more than just the
Dalmatian coast.

The key, I think, is what were the aboriginal languages in the province of
Moesia.

> Why I cannot understand is the following fact : if the Albanian
>was located at South Danube, and we had 600 years of Roman occupation
>in the "Balkan albanian area" how we explain the facts that the
>albanians wasn't romanized ?

The Basques were under Roman occupation for slightly longer (650 ~ 700
years).


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...