From: m_iacomi
Message: 26885
Date: 2003-11-04
> The real gain for every person is when he can learn something[...]
> new. I'm here to confront my ideas and to learn something...
> But I'm sorry to say the arguments that are now on "the table"... proving that despite your claimed disponibility, you still
> against : "Bess" are not really valid arguments...
> As an example : somebody wrote here that alb. "bese:" is aI mentioned the Pokorny and Demiraj entries, so I guess that
> loanword in Albanian and we cannot take it into account based on
> its "s", or based on the Pokorny's list etc...
> ..however Hamp takes seriously the Albanian "s" problem when he... that is: *not* an /s/, in perfect agreement with what was
> writes regarding "besë" :
>
> "[...] The truth is that Albanian shows a present-day s (pasë 'had
> [participle]', besë 'faith, loyalty') [...]. This must go back to
> a groove affricate, perhaps *ts. "
> As context of the current item I would add :You're mixing up unrelated and irrelevant things.
> a) today Albanian language could be very well at least a
> mixture of a Daco-Getae dialect and "something else" ...if
> not a full daco-getae dialect...(my opinion).
> b) I also show here, based on the P^arvan presented toponimy (not
> invented by him) that historically we had a Dacian infiltration in
> today Albania...(see also "dava" toponimy map to other authors...)
> ...so we cannot reduce this example on a coincidence among 3-4
> letters : "bess"
> I need to consult some books before to can say anything... [...]That is correct in general (not only with respect to toponyms).
> So please show me the proof ...I will read, if needed, additionalSince you're willingful to read, try first with some general
> stuf on Albanian historical linguistics, before to come back...