From: alex
Message: 26886
Date: 2003-11-04
>hmnmmm.. .. peace with us.
> To sum up, <besë> comes from earlier *bec^ë. Both the *e and the *c^
> can come from more than one source, but it's generally accepted that
> *besë is an abstract noun derived from the well-known root *bHendH-
> 'bind' (metaphorically, , and indeed it can be derived without the
> slightest difficulty from *bHéndH-tah2 (*-twah2 would also work; both
> suffixes form nomina actionis) > *bént(s)ta: > *bêc^ë > besë (*ê was
> a nasal vowel, which developed into <e> before a following *c^ as in
> *penkWe +
> -a: > *pêc^ë > pesë '5'). In other words, the reconstructed ancestor
> of <besë> was pronounced more or less like "bencha" (*bêc^ë) in Roman
> times. If that's similar to Bessi, I'm similar to Gandhi.
> Piotr