Re: [tied] anomaly

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 06:28:03 +0100, alex <alxmoeller@...>
> wrote:
>
>> but first, it seems to me I need to understand very generally what
>> meant initially "oblique" (its way to be used, the necessity of
>> having an oblique aspect)
>
> The oblique _case_ in Romanian corresponds to the Latin genitive and
> dative.

Just a moment Miguel. There is no "oblique" case in Romanian as such. At
least I am not aware of something like this and in the literature I read
there is no mention about any oblique case in Romanian. There are just
the well known 5 cases:
Nom, Gen, Dat, Acc, Voc.

Are you sure we are speaking about the same thing? If yes, then one of
us -more probably is me the one- use different notion for what you call
here "oblique". And this is why I asked for a definition of the
"oblique" case for understanding the way of using it.

>
>> and where was it used. If you will be so kind to make
>> the difference between the oblique in PIE and oblique in Latin that
>> would be very appreciated.
>
> PIE and Latin had more than just two cases, so there is no single
> oblique case as there is in Romanian.
>
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...

Hmmm.. I am afraid somewhere the path is lost or I lost it.How I said,
one does not speak about this oblique case in Rom.

Alex